On August 21, 2008 the Court of Appeals issued an opinion regarding workers compensation and attorney fees. It ruled that the Workers' Compensation Appellate Commission correctly awarded attorney fees to a claimant whose medical bills were not paid until he hired an attorney and sought relief from the Workers' Compensation Agency.
The Court ruled that attorney fees were appropriate. In Harvlie vs. Jack Post, Docket No. 276044, the magistrate found that plaintiff’s counsel was entitled to an attorney fee (30%) under MCL 418.315(1) with regard to the unpaid medical bills. The magistrate agreed with plaintiff’s counsel that “the bills would not have been paid but for the fact that he filed a petition.” Moreover, because the bills were not paid within 30 days of their receipt, the magistrate ordered defendants to pay a $1,500 penalty. Further, the bills were to be paid by the insurance company, and not the health care provider who benefited by the attorney's efforts.
Upon review of the case it would appear that attorney fees on unpaid medical bills are not appropriate in every case. In this case the employer/insurance carrier had refused to pay medical bills after first being ordered to do so. It appears that the recalcitrance of the insurance carrier led to the award of attorney fees. The Court stated,
". . . it is not the compensability of the medical bills, but the ongoing failure, neglect or refusal to pay, which allows the magistrate the discretion to order the attorney fees."
Yeas, the bills were to be paid by the insurance company, and not the health care provider who benefited by the attorney's efforts.
Joshua
Posted by: injury attorney west palm beach | Tuesday, June 29, 2010 at 06:58 AM
Every professional should pay insurance for they health,so in this case if the employer/insurance carrier had refused to pay medical bills after first being ordered to do so.It appears of attorney fees.and that would be so crucial to experience!
Posted by: Medical Transcription Services | Thursday, September 23, 2010 at 03:42 AM
Thank you for sharing nice post about attorney fees.
Posted by: train accident lawyer | Thursday, February 17, 2011 at 12:16 AM
Sometime many metrolink accident victim can't afford attorney fees.
Posted by: metrolink train accident | Thursday, February 17, 2011 at 12:17 AM
Some asbestos cancer attorney work on contingent fee basis.
Posted by: asbestos cancer attorney | Thursday, February 17, 2011 at 12:19 AM
IRS tax lawyer usually charge on lump sum basis.
Posted by: irs tax lawyer | Thursday, February 17, 2011 at 12:20 AM
Asbestos injury compensation claims have been made against asbestos manufacturers ever since the link between exposure to asbestos and diseases such as asbestosis and mesothelioma was first acknowledged.I think,A solicitor will also be able to ensure that your claim for asbestos injury compensation not only covers the physical injury that you have sustained, but also the costs of ongoing care, medical expenses and any other addition expense or loss of income that you have incurred.
Posted by: Asbestos Injury Compensation Claim | Friday, April 01, 2011 at 08:12 AM
Let's just all be professional when dealing on things such as fees. In scenario like this, I think the insurance company has to pay.
Posted by: Abesbaumann.com | Wednesday, June 08, 2011 at 11:05 PM
A good work injury attorney can make all the difference when it comes to seeking compensation. And I agree also, that in a situation like this the insurance company does have to pay.
Posted by: Jared Everton | Friday, June 17, 2011 at 12:28 PM
I had to bookmark this site, its awesome!
Posted by: Physician Assistant | Thursday, June 30, 2011 at 10:28 PM